One of the reasons I like PL so much is because they've grown and changed along with me. The hard-driving sound in 1992's "Pity The Sadness" (WMV), for example, is a far cry from pop experiments like 1999's "So Much Is Lost" (WMV), which is in turn different from the fare on the 2005 self-titled CD. (First single is "Forever After"; WMV). Seriously... They almost look like three different bands. I admire their risk-taking approach.
Now all that they have to do is tour the states. Perhaps some of the lesser-yet-inexplicably-more-successful bands they've inspired will take them on tour?
In some respects, I share her [Strumpette's] concern. I believe blogging, as the delicate olive branch of PR, must be handled by the absolute best-of-the-best our industry offers. These are the Tim Dysons, the Richard Edelmans and the Andy Larks.
Gee, Daniel... Great that you mentioned my boss in that list, but besides "years in PR," I'm not sure what "best-of-the-best" means here.
I don't think Blake, Erin, Luke, or anyone else got that memo. They should give up? Or wait in some kind of penalty box until they're decades into this profession?
What kind of crazy f**ked up world do we live in where "Smells Like Teen Spirit" is revered as a generational breakthrough but "Eighteen" is ignored. Shit, the Nirvana song has got a great riff, but its words don’t COMPETE with those of the Alice Cooper anthem.
I agree with Lefsetz... Alice Cooper richly deserves to be in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.
As Gregory Kohs pointed out, the flames that burn brightest, burn shortest. In but a few weeks, I predict that the Brian-Connolly-linked sockpuppet known as Strumpette will (to quote Larry) have bruises from all of the ten-foot-poles touching her.
I was inspired to write after Strumpette, for some bizarre reason, took a swipe at Shel Holtz -- possibly one of the most likeable people in our business. Shel responded and Strumpette filled the comments area with his/her usual ad hominems and demonstrably ill-informed dreck. (S/he has also demonstrated a newfound affinity for the adjective "inane," as you can also see here and here.)
To be honest, if the point of the Strumpette blog was to poke some good-natured fun at the PR blogosphere, I'd probably be a fan. Actually, my girlfriend and I got a pretty big kick out of Strumpette's characterization of me as "a geek who had a website early on and decided to change the content a lot." Good one.
Nope... The Strumpette blog is nothing of the sort. It's a mean-spirited site based on an unsustainable premise, thought by a number of folks to be written by a clearly bitter man.
I mean, seriously... This is getting ridiculous. Once s/he started running out of new/big targets, Strumpy decided to go after students!
STUDENTS!
Now, if Strumpette follows his/her modus operandi, this here post will result in an anti-Phil hit piece. Look at the behavior... No sooner had Jeremy Pepperouted Strumpy's puppetmaster and described his IM conversations with Tom Biro, a piece excoriating the both of them went up. Shel got twodings in before Strumpy decided to take aim at him.
You'd think Strumpy would change his/her pattern a bit so as not to be so predictable.
I don't care. My Give-A-Damn-A-Nometer is way below zero.
Thing is, Strumpette can't seem to decide whether it's a character blog or something that people ought to take seriously. S/he dons either hat when it suits him/her.
So, yeah... I predict that Strumpy's fan base will probably disintegrate into the half-dozen men who still punch their munchkins in front of his/her homepage, thinking that the woman in the stock photo is someone they'll actually run into at the BlogOn Conference or whatever.
The thing is, i'm only doing this 'cause I can. I mean, seriously... The only two people who would want to keep up with this blog that closely would be my Mom and Dad, and their phones aren't even web-capable!
As Luke mentions in Forward, I did some interviewing of my own about careers in communication — the next episode of the earSHOT podcast. Great group of guests. Making time to cut the various pieces of the episode has been a bit of a challenge this week, but I'll have it up early next week.
I wish someone would do something similar for guitar ads. I remember when BC Rich came out with their "Virgin" guitar. The ad was a drawing of an attractive woman lying in bed next to a very happy skeleton wearing a metal shirt and long hair. The Virgin guitar was lying next to said skeleton. The tagline said something like "You haven't lived until you've plucked a Virgin." Needless to say, the guitar mags got a few angry letters.
This is a funny story, sent via email (emphasis mine):
Apparently, our daughter struck up a funny dinner conversation last night... She told everyone that there are some bad words like, "Sh*t". And you shouldn't say, "Sh*t" because "Sh*t" is a bad word to say! And "Sh*t" means when you can't find something! And only adults should say that word! That's when Bob said, "Well, let's not use that word anymore, OK?" She said, "OK, I know it's a bad word and you should never say it!"
I want to start by saying that I like Bill Holstein of Chief Executive magazine. I met him (I believe) at the International Industrial Conference that my then-client, SRI, helped put on with The Conference Board. At that time, he was writing for U.S. News & World Report.
Beat up on PR people, either individually or as a group.
Wait for all of the attention.
Watch traffic rise as a result.
Beating up on PR people is a nice, easy target. Journalists are in a fairly safe position to do this because any real retaliation from the flack would be a severely career-limiting move.
Hey... I gotta call it as I see it.
As I've said before, it's about as interesting as a lawyer joke. IMHO, I have nothing to defend.
Honestly... Every quarter or so, you get the old, rehashed complaints about the field's worst practitioners. Heck, even Holstein's comment about PR's "Jason's and Jennifer's" harkens back to a column Ed Cone wrote for the defunct Interactive Week in 2001 or so. (Cone references it in his blog in 2003, but I can't find the original.)
I humbly suggest: If Chief Executive magazine wants to get into an interesting argument about PR that comes close to cresting a CEO's interest level, I recommend:
Discussing PR's value as a management discipline.
The attention paid to communications versus law and even finance.
I'll participate in any rhetorically sound argument discussing PR's value.
Note that the views expressed on this site do not necessarily reflect those of Phil's employer, its business partners, its clients, or anyone or anything that doesn't come from Phil.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
This blog not only discusses PR and media matters, but Phil's everyday observations about a variety of topics.
Comments and trackbacks are unmoderated, though I will delete the patently offensive ones.
Any comments and trackbacks are the opinions of the individual writer of those comments and trackbacks, and not those of Phil Gomes, his employer, its clients, or its business partners. If you have a bone to pick, bug the people who wrote the comment or trackback.